CVE-2026-97424
What it is
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amdgpu/ras: add ras_suspend callback and use it for cp_ecc_error_irq cp_ecc_error_irq is acquired in amdgpu_gfx_ras_late_init() but released in gfx_v9_0_hw_fini(), so the put site has to query amdgpu_irq_enabled() because the get is skipped on SR-IOV VF. ras_late_init / ras_fini have no suspend counterpart, so move the put to amdgpu_gfx_ras_suspend() / amdgpu_gfx_ras_fini() and add a matching ras_suspend callback that is invoked from amdgpu_ras_suspend() before disable_all_features(). The get and put now sit in the same place and check the same condition (not VF, funcs registered), no refcount querying needed. An active flag gates ras_fini so the suspend-then-unload-without-resume path falls into amdgpu_ras_block_late_fini_default() instead of double-releasing what ras_suspend already cleaned up. Drop the cp_ecc_error_irq put from gfx_v9_0_hw_fini(). gfx_v8_0 manages cp_ecc_error_irq locally and is unaffected; no other GFX generation has this IRQ.
At a glance
- Exploit odds
- 0.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: not scored yet.
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Received
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2026-97424.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2026-97424. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
