CVE-2026-95829
What it is
A vulnerability was identified in TDuckCloud tduck-platform up to 5.3. This vulnerability affects the function PaginationInnerInterceptor.concatOrderBy of the file tduck-api/src/main/java/com/tduck/cloud/api/config/MybatisPlusConfig.java of the component Pagination Inner Interceptor. The manipulation of the argument orders[0].column leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The identifier of the patch is ea7f0fae7cb0fd998a3284c11addce689350cd69. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network with a low-privilege account. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 0.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 2.1 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-74
- Record status
- Deferred
Attack profile CVSS 4.0 · 2.1
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2026-95829.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2026-95829. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
