CVE-2026-72396
What it is
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: hwmon: adm1275: Prevent reading uninitialized stack While adding support for the ROHM BD127X0 hot-swap controllers, sashiko reported an error in device-name comparison, which can lead to reading uninitialized stack memory. Quoting Sashiko: This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed that just before this block in adm1275_probe(), there might be an out-of-bounds stack read: ret = i2c_smbus_read_block_data(client, PMBUS_MFR_MODEL, block_buffer); if (ret < 0) { ... } for (mid = adm1275_id; mid->name[0]; mid++) { if (!strncasecmp(mid->name, block_buffer, strlen(mid->name))) break; } Since i2c_smbus_read_block_data() reads up to 32 bytes into the uninitialized stack array block_buffer without appending a null terminator, strncasecmp() could read past the valid bytes returned in ret. For example, if the device returns a shorter string like "adm12", checking it against "adm1275" up to the length of "adm1275" will continue reading into uninitialized stack bounds. Prevent reading uninitialized memory by zeroing the stack array.
At a glance
- Exploit odds
- 0.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: not scored yet.
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Received
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2026-72396.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2026-72396. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/36554592e2f5cac16ff8bf73720d38a6d9ef4a20
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/39a581bd64a0e91112ec8017a2dd4e70c1336e99
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/553f9517813912a5ab661af5504485d96824a61c
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/57d583f069fa9d3d0c0831e34b967d1f61edae94
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/82e4ab03a6ab9b87667410f5143bc484d7a62bdc
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/93b96e723bdcba6172a5814262be875abcc5d269
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/aa35cee30686e6be3c890bf741429c5025d55abe
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c9e04a52663bc6651c06c2427df088b751062bd6