CVE-2026-23181
What it is
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: sync read disk super and set block size When the user performs a btrfs mount, the block device is not set correctly. The user sets the block size of the block device to 0x4000 by executing the BLKBSZSET command. Since the block size change also changes the mapping->flags value, this further affects the result of the mapping_min_folio_order() calculation. Let's analyze the following two scenarios: Scenario 1: Without executing the BLKBSZSET command, the block size is 0x1000, and mapping_min_folio_order() returns 0; Scenario 2: After executing the BLKBSZSET command, the block size is 0x4000, and mapping_min_folio_order() returns 2. do_read_cache_folio() allocates a folio before the BLKBSZSET command is executed. This results in the allocated folio having an order value of 0. Later, after BLKBSZSET is executed, the block size increases to 0x4000, and the mapping_min_folio_order() calculation result becomes 2. This leads to two undesirable consequences: 1. filemap_add_folio() triggers a VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_order(folio) < mapping_min_folio_order(mapping)) assertion. 2. The syzbot report [1] shows a null pointer dereference in create_empty_buffers() due to a buffer head allocation failure. Synchronization should be established based on the inode between the BLKBSZSET command and read cache page to prevent inconsistencies in block size or mapping flags before and after folio allocation. [1] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] RIP: 0010:create_empty_buffers+0x4d/0x480 fs/buffer.c:1694 Call Trace: folio_create_buffers+0x109/0x150 fs/buffer.c:1802 block_read_full_folio+0x14c/0x850 fs/buffer.c:2403 filemap_read_folio+0xc8/0x2a0 mm/filemap.c:2496 do_read_cache_folio+0x266/0x5c0 mm/filemap.c:4096 do_read_cache_page mm/filemap.c:4162 [inline] read_cache_page_gfp+0x29/0x120 mm/filemap.c:4195 btrfs_read_disk_super+0x192/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1367
At a glance
- Exploit odds
- 0.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: not scored yet.
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Deferred
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2026-23181.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2026-23181. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
