CVE-2026-105740
What it is
Langflow is a tool for building and deploying AI-powered agents and workflows. Prior to 1.9.0, any authenticated Langflow user can achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the server by adding an MCP server with the "Stdio" transport. The user-supplied command field is passed directly to bash -c "exec {command}" with zero validation, no allowlisting, and no sandboxing. The command executes immediately when the server list is fetched. Additionally, the env field allows arbitrary environment variable injection (e.g., LD_PRELOAD, PATH override). This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.0.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network with a low-privilege account. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 3.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- ReservedThe CVE id was reserved by its CNA
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 3.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 9.9 CRITICAL (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 3.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-78 · OS command injection
- Record status
- Awaiting Analysis
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 9.9
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2026-105740.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2026-105740. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/efbc4a16e639409d938a4883463d27ef0bc637a0
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/12290
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-7w94-79vh-5mr2
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-w794-rj3p-xv45
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-7w94-79vh-5mr2
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-w794-rj3p-xv45
References
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/commit/efbc4a16e639409d938a4883463d27ef0bc637a0
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/pull/12290
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-7w94-79vh-5mr2
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-w794-rj3p-xv45
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-7w94-79vh-5mr2
- https://github.com/langflow-ai/langflow/security/advisories/GHSA-w794-rj3p-xv45