CVE-2025-54087
What it is
CVE-2025-54087 is a server-side request forgery vulnerability in Secure Access prior to version 14.10. Attackers with administrative privileges can publish a crafted test HTTP request originating from the Secure Access server. The attack complexity is high, there are no attack requirements, and user interaction is required. There is no direct impact to confidentiality, integrity, or availability. There is a low severity subsequent system impact to integrity.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network with an admin-level account, but needs a user to act. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 0.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 1.8 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-918 · Server-side request forgery
- Record status
- Analyzed
Affected
- Absolute Secure Access < 14.10
Attack profile CVSS 4.0 · 1.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Attack requirements
- None
- Privileges needed
- High
- User interaction
- Active
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2025-54087.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2025-54087. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
