CVE-2024-3596
What it is
RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 14.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- ReservedThe CVE id was reserved by its CNA
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 14.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 9.0 CRITICAL (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 14.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-354
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Freeradius < 3.0.27
- Broadcom Brocade Sannav
- Broadcom Fabric Operating System
- Sonicwall Sonicos
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 9.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2024-3596.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2024-3596. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-723487.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794185.html
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865
- https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014
- https://www.blastradius.fail/
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/
- https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865
- https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240822-0001/
- https://today.ucsd.edu/story/computer-scientists-discover-vulnerabilities-in-a-popular-security-protocol
- https://www.blastradius.fail/
- https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/456537
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-364175.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-723487.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-770770.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794185.html