CVE-2024-21491
What it is
Versions of the package svix before 1.17.0 are vulnerable to Authentication Bypass due to an issue in the verify function where signatures of different lengths are incorrectly compared. An attacker can bypass signature verification by providing a shorter signature that matches the beginning of the actual signature. **Note:** The attacker would need to know a victim uses the Rust library for verification,no easy way to automatically check that; and uses webhooks by a service that uses Svix, and then figure out a way to craft a malicious payload that will actually include all of the correct identifiers needed to trick the receivers to cause actual issues.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in, but needs a user to act. High risk of data tampering.
- Exploit odds
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.9 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-288
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Svix svix-webhooks < 1.17.0
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 5.9
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2024-21491.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2024-21491. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/commit/958821bd3b956d1436af65f70a0964d4ffb7daf6
- https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/pull/1190
- https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/commit/958821bd3b956d1436af65f70a0964d4ffb7daf6
- https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/pull/1190
References
- https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/commit/958821bd3b956d1436af65f70a0964d4ffb7daf6
- https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/pull/1190
- https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0010.html
- https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUST-SVIX-6230729
- https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/commit/958821bd3b956d1436af65f70a0964d4ffb7daf6
- https://github.com/svix/svix-webhooks/pull/1190
- https://rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2024-0010.html
- https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-RUST-SVIX-6230729