CVE-2023-4527
What it is
A flaw was found in glibc. When the getaddrinfo function is called with the AF_UNSPEC address family and the system is configured with no-aaaa mode via /etc/resolv.conf, a DNS response via TCP larger than 2048 bytes can potentially disclose stack contents through the function returned address data, and may cause a crash.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 1.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 6.5 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-121
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Gnu Glibc < 2.36.113
- Gnu Glibc < 2.37.38
- Gnu Glibc < 2.38.19
- Redhat Codeready Linux Builder Eus 9.2
- Redhat Codeready Linux Builder Eus For Power Little Endian 9.0_ppc64le
- Redhat Codeready Linux Builder Eus For Power Little Endian Eus 9.2_ppc64le
- Redhat Codeready Linux Builder For arm64 9.0_aarch64
- Redhat Codeready Linux Builder For arm64 Eus 9.2_aarch64
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 6.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2023-4527.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2023-4527. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:5453
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:5455
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-4527
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234712
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/25/1
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:5453
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2023:5455
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-4527
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2234712
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/4DBUQRRPB47TC3NJOUIBVWUGFHBJAFDL/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/DFG4P76UHHZEWQ26FWBXG76N2QLKKPZA/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/NDAQWHTSVOCOZ5K6KPIWKRT3JX4RTZUR/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202310-03
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231116-0012/
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-082556.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-831302.html