CVE-2022-33748
What it is
lock order inversion in transitive grant copy handling As part of XSA-226 a missing cleanup call was inserted on an error handling path. While doing so, locking requirements were not paid attention to. As a result two cooperating guests granting each other transitive grants can cause locks to be acquired nested within one another, but in respectively opposite order. With suitable timing between the involved grant copy operations this may result in the locking up of a CPU.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine with a low-privilege account. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 0.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.6 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-755
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Xen
- Fedoraproject Fedora 35
- Fedoraproject Fedora 36
- Fedoraproject Fedora 37
- Debian Linux 11.0
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 5.6
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2022-33748.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2022-33748. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/10/11/2
- http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-411.html
- https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-411.txt
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/10/11/2
- http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-411.html
- https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-411.txt
References
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/10/11/2
- http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-411.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TJOMUNGW6VTK5CZZRLWLVVEOUPEQBRHI/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XWSC77GS5NATI3TT7FMVPULUPXR635XQ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YZVXG7OOOXCX6VIPEMLFDPIPUTFAYWPE/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-07
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5272
- https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-411.txt
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/10/11/2
- http://xenbits.xen.org/xsa/advisory-411.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TJOMUNGW6VTK5CZZRLWLVVEOUPEQBRHI/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XWSC77GS5NATI3TT7FMVPULUPXR635XQ/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YZVXG7OOOXCX6VIPEMLFDPIPUTFAYWPE/
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202402-07
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5272
- https://xenbits.xenproject.org/xsa/advisory-411.txt