CVE-2022-30627
What it is
This vulnerability affects all of the company's products that also include the FW versions: update_i90_cv2.021_b20210104, update_i50_v1.0.55_b20200509, update_x6_v2.1.2_b202001127, update_b5_v2.0.9_b20200706. This vulnerability makes it possible to extract from the FW the existing user passwords on their operating systems and passwords.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine with a low-privilege account, but needs a user to act. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 0.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.7 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-798 · Hard-coded credentials
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Chcnav p5e Gnss Firmware 4.1
- Chcnav p5e Gnss Firmware 4.2
- Chcnav p5e Gnss Firmware update_b5_v2.0.9_b20200706
- Chcnav p5e Gnss Firmware update_i50_v1.0.55_b20200509
- Chcnav p5e Gnss Firmware update_i90_cv2.021_b20210104
- Chcnav p5e Gnss Firmware update_x6_v2.1.2_b202001127
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 5.7
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2022-30627.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2022-30627. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
