CVE-2022-29885
What it is
The documentation of Apache Tomcat 10.1.0-M1 to 10.1.0-M14, 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.20, 9.0.13 to 9.0.62 and 8.5.38 to 8.5.78 for the EncryptInterceptor incorrectly stated it enabled Tomcat clustering to run over an untrusted network. This was not correct. While the EncryptInterceptor does provide confidentiality and integrity protection, it does not protect against all risks associated with running over any untrusted network, particularly DoS risks.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 73.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- ReservedThe CVE id was reserved by its CNA
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 73.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 73.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-400 · Uncontrolled resource consumption
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Apache Tomcat ≤ 8.5.78
- Apache Tomcat ≤ 9.0.62
- Apache Tomcat ≤ 10.0.20
- Apache Tomcat 10.1.0
- Debian Linux 10.0
- Debian Linux 11.0
- Oracle Hospitality Cruise Shipboard Property Management System 20.2.1
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2022-29885.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2022-29885. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://lists.apache.org/thread/2b4qmhbcyqvc7dyfpjyx54c03x65vhcv
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread/2b4qmhbcyqvc7dyfpjyx54c03x65vhcv
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
References
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/171728/Apache-Tomcat-10.1-Denial-Of-Service.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread/2b4qmhbcyqvc7dyfpjyx54c03x65vhcv
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00029.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220629-0002/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5265
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/171728/Apache-Tomcat-10.1-Denial-Of-Service.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread/2b4qmhbcyqvc7dyfpjyx54c03x65vhcv
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2022/10/msg00029.html
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20220629-0002/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2022/dsa-5265
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html