CVE-2021-3450
What it is
The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j).
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering.
- Exploit odds
- 18.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 18.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.4 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 18.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-295 · Improper certificate validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- OpenSSL < 1.1.1k
- Freebsd 12.2
- Netapp Santricity smi-s Provider Firmware
- Netapp Storagegrid Firmware
- Windriver Linux
- Windriver Linux 17.0
- Windriver Linux 18.0
- Windriver Linux 19.0
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 7.4
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2021-3450.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2021-3450. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-announce/2021-March/000198.html
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210325.txt
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-announce/2021-March/000198.html
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210325.txt
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
References
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/28/4
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
- https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=2a40b7bc7b94dd7de897a74571e7024f0cf0d63b
- https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44845
- https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content&id=SB10356
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CCBFLLVQVILIVGZMBJL3IXZGKWQISYNP/
- https://mta.openssl.org/pipermail/openssl-announce/2021-March/000198.html
- https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0013
- https://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-21:07.openssl.asc
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202103-03
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210326-0006/
- https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-openssl-2021-GHY28dJd
- https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210325.txt
- https://www.oracle.com//security-alerts/cpujul2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuApr2021.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuapr2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpujul2022.html
- https://www.oracle.com/security-alerts/cpuoct2021.html
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-05
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-08
- https://www.tenable.com/security/tns-2021-09
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/03/27/1