CVE-2020-14374
What it is
A flaw was found in dpdk in versions before 18.11.10 and before 19.11.5. A flawed bounds checking in the copy_data function leads to a buffer overflow allowing an attacker in a virtual machine to write arbitrary data to any address in the vhost_crypto application. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity as well as system availability.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine with a low-privilege account. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 8.8 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-120 · Classic buffer overflow
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Dpdk Data Plane Development Kit < 18.11.10
- Dpdk Data Plane Development Kit < 19.11.5
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 20.04
- Opensuse Leap 15.1
- Opensuse Leap 15.2
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 8.8
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2020-14374.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2020-14374. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/2
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/09/28/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/2
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/09/28/3
References
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00004.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00006.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/5
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879466
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/09/28/3
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00004.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2020-10/msg00006.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/01/04/5
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1879466
- https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/09/28/3