CVE-2019-6665
What it is
On BIG-IP ASM 15.0.0-15.0.1, 14.1.0-14.1.2, 14.0.0-14.0.1, and 13.1.0-13.1.3.1, BIG-IQ 6.0.0 and 5.2.0-5.4.0, iWorkflow 2.3.0, and Enterprise Manager 3.1.1, an attacker with access to the device communication between the BIG-IP ASM Central Policy Builder and the BIG-IQ/Enterprise Manager/F5 iWorkflow will be able to set up the proxy the same way and intercept the traffic.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering.
- Exploit odds
- 1.1% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.1% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 9.4 CRITICAL (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.1% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- f5 big-ip Application Security Manager ≤ 13.1.3.1
- f5 big-ip Application Security Manager ≤ 14.0.1
- f5 big-ip Application Security Manager ≤ 14.1.2
- f5 big-ip Application Security Manager ≤ 15.0.1
- f5 big-iq Centralized Management ≤ 5.4.0
- f5 big-iq Centralized Management 6.0.0
- f5 Enterprise Manager 3.1.1
- f5 Iworkflow 2.3.0
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 9.4
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2019-6665.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2019-6665. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
