CVE-2019-11324
What it is
The urllib3 library before 1.24.2 for Python mishandles certain cases where the desired set of CA certificates is different from the OS store of CA certificates, which results in SSL connections succeeding in situations where a verification failure is the correct outcome. This is related to use of the ssl_context, ca_certs, or ca_certs_dir argument.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data tampering.
- Exploit odds
- 2.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-295 · Improper certificate validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Python urllib3 < 1.24.2
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 16.04
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 18.04
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 18.10
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 19.04
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2019-11324.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2019-11324. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/compare/a6ec68a...1efadf4
- https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/compare/a6ec68a...1efadf4
References
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00039.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00041.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/19/1
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3335
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3590
- https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/compare/a6ec68a...1efadf4
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00015.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/10/msg00012.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NKGPJLVLVYCL4L4B4G5TIOTVK4BKPG72/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XOSA2NT4DUQDBEIWE6O7KKD24XND7TE2/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/3990-1/
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00039.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-09/msg00041.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2019/04/19/1
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3335
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3590
- https://github.com/urllib3/urllib3/compare/a6ec68a...1efadf4
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/06/msg00015.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2023/10/msg00012.html
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NKGPJLVLVYCL4L4B4G5TIOTVK4BKPG72/
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XOSA2NT4DUQDBEIWE6O7KKD24XND7TE2/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/3990-1/