CVE-2018-1128
What it is
It was found that cephx authentication protocol did not verify ceph clients correctly and was vulnerable to replay attack. Any attacker having access to ceph cluster network who is able to sniff packets on network can use this vulnerability to authenticate with ceph service and perform actions allowed by ceph service. Ceph branches master, mimic, luminous and jewel are believed to be vulnerable.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited from the same network segment without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 1.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-294
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Redhat Ceph Storage 3
- Redhat Ceph Storage Mon 2
- Redhat Ceph Storage Mon 3
- Redhat Ceph Storage Osd 2
- Redhat Ceph Storage Osd 3
- Redhat Enterprise Linux 7.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Desktop 7.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Server 7.0
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Adjacent network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2018-1128.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2018-1128. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/24836
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575866
- https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/5ead97120e07054d80623dada90a5cc764c28468
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/24836
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575866
- https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/5ead97120e07054d80623dada90a5cc764c28468
References
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00100.html
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/24836
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/11/17/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/11/17/4
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2177
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2179
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2261
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2274
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575866
- https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/5ead97120e07054d80623dada90a5cc764c28468
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00017.html
- https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4339
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-04/msg00100.html
- http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/24836
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/11/17/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2020/11/17/4
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2177
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2179
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2261
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2274
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1575866
- https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/5ead97120e07054d80623dada90a5cc764c28468
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2019/03/msg00017.html
- https://www.debian.org/security/2018/dsa-4339