CVE-2017-8804
What it is
The xdr_bytes and xdr_string functions in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.25 mishandle failures of buffer deserialization, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (virtual memory allocation, or memory consumption if an overcommit setting is not used) via a crafted UDP packet to port 111, a related issue to CVE-2017-8779. NOTE: [Information provided from upstream and references
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 7.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 7.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 7.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-502 · Unsafe deserialization
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Gnu Glibc 2.25
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2017-8804.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2017-8804. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037559#c7
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21461
- https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-05/msg00105.html
- https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037559#c7
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21461
- https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-05/msg00105.html
References
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00026.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00039.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00049.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/05/05/2
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98339
- https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037559#c7
- https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q2/228
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21461
- https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/libc-alpha/2017-05/msg00128.html
- https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/libc-alpha/2017-05/msg00129.html
- https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-05/msg00105.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00026.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00039.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2018-02/msg00049.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/05/05/2
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/98339
- https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037559#c7
- https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2017/q2/228
- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21461
- https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/libc-alpha/2017-05/msg00128.html
- https://sourceware.org/legacy-ml/libc-alpha/2017-05/msg00129.html
- https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2017-05/msg00105.html