CVE-2017-5992
What it is
Openpyxl 2.4.1 resolves external entities by default, which allows remote attackers to conduct XXE attacks via a crafted .xlsx document.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in, but needs a user to act. High risk of data exposure, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 1.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 8.2 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-611 · XML external entity
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Python Openpyxl 2.4.1
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 8.2
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2017-5992.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2017-5992. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/07/5
- https://bitbucket.org/openpyxl/openpyxl/commits/3b4905f428e1
- https://bitbucket.org/openpyxl/openpyxl/issues/749
- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854442
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/02/07/5
- https://bitbucket.org/openpyxl/openpyxl/commits/3b4905f428e1
- https://bitbucket.org/openpyxl/openpyxl/issues/749
- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854442