CVE-2017-1000385
What it is
The Erlang otp TLS server answers with different TLS alerts to different error types in the RSA PKCS #1 1.5 padding. This allows an attacker to decrypt content or sign messages with the server's private key (this is a variation of the Bleichenbacher attack).
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure.
- Exploit odds
- 22.1% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 22.1% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.9 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 22.1% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-203
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Erlang erlang\/otp 18.3.4.7
- Erlang erlang\/otp 19.3.6.4
- Erlang erlang\/otp 20.1.7
- Debian Linux 8.0
- Debian Linux 9.0
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 5.9
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2017-1000385.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2017-1000385. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2017-November/094255.html
- http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2017-November/094256.html
- http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2017-November/094257.html
- http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2017-November/094255.html
- http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2017-November/094256.html
- http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2017-November/094257.html
References
- http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2017-November/094255.html
- http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2017-November/094256.html
- http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2017-November/094257.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102197
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0242
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0303
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0368
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0528
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00010.html
- https://robotattack.org/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/3571-1/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4057
- https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/144389
- http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2017-November/094255.html
- http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2017-November/094256.html
- http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2017-November/094257.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/102197
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0242
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0303
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0368
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0528
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00010.html
- https://robotattack.org/
- https://usn.ubuntu.com/3571-1/
- https://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-4057