CVE-2016-9560
What it is
Stack-based buffer overflow in the jpc_tsfb_getbands2 function in jpc_tsfb.c in JasPer before 1.900.30 allows remote attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted image.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in, but needs a user to act. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 2.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.8 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-787 · Out-of-bounds write
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Jasper Project Jasper < 1.900.30
- Debian Linux 8.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Desktop 6.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Desktop 7.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Eus 7.3
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Eus 7.4
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Eus 7.5
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Eus 7.6
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 7.8
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2016-9560.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2016-9560. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/20/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/23/5
- https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2016/11/20/jasper-stack-based-buffer-overflow-in-jpc_tsfb_getbands2-jpc_tsfb-c/
- https://github.com/Hack-Me/Pocs_for_Multi_Versions/tree/main/CVE-2016-9560
- https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/commit/1abc2e5a401a4bf1d5ca4df91358ce5df111f495
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/20/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/23/5
- https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2016/11/20/jasper-stack-based-buffer-overflow-in-jpc_tsfb_getbands2-jpc_tsfb-c/
- https://github.com/Hack-Me/Pocs_for_Multi_Versions/tree/main/CVE-2016-9560
- https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/commit/1abc2e5a401a4bf1d5ca4df91358ce5df111f495
References
- http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3785
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/20/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/23/5
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94428
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1208
- https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2016/11/20/jasper-stack-based-buffer-overflow-in-jpc_tsfb_getbands2-jpc_tsfb-c/
- https://github.com/Hack-Me/Pocs_for_Multi_Versions/tree/main/CVE-2016-9560
- https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/commit/1abc2e5a401a4bf1d5ca4df91358ce5df111f495
- http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3785
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/20/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/23/5
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94428
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1208
- https://blogs.gentoo.org/ago/2016/11/20/jasper-stack-based-buffer-overflow-in-jpc_tsfb_getbands2-jpc_tsfb-c/
- https://github.com/Hack-Me/Pocs_for_Multi_Versions/tree/main/CVE-2016-9560
- https://github.com/mdadams/jasper/commit/1abc2e5a401a4bf1d5ca4df91358ce5df111f495