CVE-2016-9298
What it is
Heap overflow in the WaveletDenoiseImage function in MagickCore/fx.c in ImageMagick before 6.9.6-4 and 7.x before 7.0.3-6 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted image.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in, but needs a user to act. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 1.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.5 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Imagemagick ≤ 6.9.6-3
- Imagemagick 7.0.1-0
- Imagemagick 7.0.1-1
- Imagemagick 7.0.1-2
- Imagemagick 7.0.1-3
- Imagemagick 7.0.1-4
- Imagemagick 7.0.1-5
- Imagemagick 7.0.1-6
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 5.5
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2016-9298.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2016-9298. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/13/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/14/10
- https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/3cbfb163cff9e5b8cdeace8312e9bfee810ed02b
- https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/296
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/13/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/14/10
- https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/3cbfb163cff9e5b8cdeace8312e9bfee810ed02b
- https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/296
References
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/13/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/14/10
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94310
- https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/3cbfb163cff9e5b8cdeace8312e9bfee810ed02b
- https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/296
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-09
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/13/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/14/10
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94310
- https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/commit/3cbfb163cff9e5b8cdeace8312e9bfee810ed02b
- https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/issues/296
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-09