CVE-2016-7091
What it is
sudo: It was discovered that the default sudo configuration on Red Hat Enterprise Linux and possibly other Linux implementations preserves the value of INPUTRC which could lead to information disclosure. A local user with sudo access to a restricted program that uses readline could use this flaw to read content from specially formatted files with elevated privileges provided by sudo.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine with an admin-level account. High risk of data exposure.
- Exploit odds
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.4 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-200 · Information exposure
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Redhat Enterprise Linux
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Desktop 7.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Hpc Node 7.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Server 7.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Workstation 7.0
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 4.4
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2016-7091.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2016-7091. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
References
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92615
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-readline/2016-05/msg00009.html
- https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2593.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92615
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-readline/2016-05/msg00009.html
- https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2593.html