CVE-2016-7035
What it is
An authorization flaw was found in Pacemaker before 1.1.16, where it did not properly guard its IPC interface. An attacker with an unprivileged account on a Pacemaker node could use this flaw to, for example, force the Local Resource Manager daemon to execute a script as root and thereby gain root access on the machine.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine with a low-privilege account. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 8.8 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-285
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Clusterlabs Pacemaker ≤ 1.1.16
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Server 6.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Server 7.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Server Eus 7.3
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Server Eus 7.4
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Server Eus 7.5
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Server Eus 7.6
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 8.8
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2016-7035.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2016-7035. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/5d71e65049
- https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2016-November/004432.html
- https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/5d71e65049
- https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2016-November/004432.html
References
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2614.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2675.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/5
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94214
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7035
- https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/5d71e65049
- https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2016-November/004432.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-08
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2614.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2675.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/11/03/5
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/94214
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-7035
- https://github.com/ClusterLabs/pacemaker/commit/5d71e65049
- https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/users/2016-November/004432.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201710-08