CVE-2016-6250
What it is
Integer overflow in the ISO9660 writer in libarchive before 3.2.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or execute arbitrary code via vectors related to verifying filename lengths when writing an ISO9660 archive, which trigger a buffer overflow.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 6.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 6.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 8.6 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 6.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-190 · Integer overflow
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Oracle Linux 7
- Libarchive ≤ 3.2.0
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 8.6
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2016-6250.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2016-6250. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/commit/3014e198
- https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/issues/711
- https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/commit/3014e198
- https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/issues/711
References
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1844.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/07/20/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/07/21/3
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjul2016-3090544.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92036
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036431
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347085
- https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/commit/3014e198
- https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/files/295073/libarchiveOverflow.txt
- https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/issues/711
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-03
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1844.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/07/20/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/07/21/3
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/linuxbulletinjul2016-3090544.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92036
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1036431
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347085
- https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/commit/3014e198
- https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/files/295073/libarchiveOverflow.txt
- https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/issues/711
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-03