CVE-2016-5672
What it is
Intel Crosswalk before 19.49.514.5, 20.x before 20.50.533.11, 21.x before 21.51.546.0, and 22.x before 22.51.549.0 interprets a user's acceptance of one invalid X.509 certificate to mean that all invalid X.509 certificates should be accepted without prompting, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in, but needs a user to act. High risk of data exposure, data tampering.
- Exploit odds
- 1.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 8.1 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-20 · Improper input validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Intel Crosswalk ≤ 19.49.514.4
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 8.1
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2016-5672.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2016-5672. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/
- https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/pipermail/crosswalk-help/2016-July/002167.html
- https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/
- https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/pipermail/crosswalk-help/2016-July/002167.html
References
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138107/Intel-Crosswalk-Project-Man-In-The-Middle.html
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/217871
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539051/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92199
- https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/
- https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-6986
- https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/pipermail/crosswalk-help/2016-July/002167.html
- https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2016/07/29/advisory-intel-crosswalk-ssl-prompt-issue
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/138107/Intel-Crosswalk-Project-Man-In-The-Middle.html
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/217871
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/539051/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/92199
- https://blogs.intel.com/evangelists/2016/07/28/crosswalk-security-vulnerability/
- https://crosswalk-project.org/jira/browse/XWALK-6986
- https://lists.crosswalk-project.org/pipermail/crosswalk-help/2016-July/002167.html
- https://wwws.nightwatchcybersecurity.com/2016/07/29/advisory-intel-crosswalk-ssl-prompt-issue