CVE-2016-2392
What it is
The is_rndis function in the USB Net device emulator (hw/usb/dev-network.c) in QEMU before 2.5.1 does not properly validate USB configuration descriptor objects, which allows local guest OS administrators to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and QEMU process crash) via vectors involving a remote NDIS control message packet.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine with a low-privilege account. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 6.5 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Qemu 2.5.0
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 12.04
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 14.04
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 15.10
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 16.04
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 6.5
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2016-2392.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2016-2392. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-stable/2016-03/msg00064.html
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-02/msg02553.html
- http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-stable/2016-03/msg00064.html
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-02/msg02553.html
References
- http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=80eecda8e5d09c442c24307f340840a5b70ea3b9
- http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-stable/2016-03/msg00064.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/02/16/7
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/83274
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2974-1
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302299
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/11/msg00038.html
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-02/msg02553.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201604-01
- http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=80eecda8e5d09c442c24307f340840a5b70ea3b9
- http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-stable/2016-03/msg00064.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/02/16/7
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/83274
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2974-1
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302299
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/11/msg00038.html
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-02/msg02553.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201604-01