CVE-2016-1981
What it is
QEMU (aka Quick Emulator) built with the e1000 NIC emulation support is vulnerable to an infinite loop issue. It could occur while processing data via transmit or receive descriptors, provided the initial receive/transmit descriptor head (TDH/RDH) is set outside the allocated descriptor buffer. A privileged user inside guest could use this flaw to crash the QEMU instance resulting in DoS.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine with a low-privilege account. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.5 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-835
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Qemu ≤ 2.5.1.1
- Debian Linux 7.0
- Debian Linux 8.0
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 5.5
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2016-1981.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2016-1981. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-01/msg03454.html
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-01/msg03454.html
References
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2585.html
- http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3469
- http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3470
- http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3471
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/01/19/10
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/01/22/1
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/81549
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298570
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-01/msg03454.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201604-01
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2585.html
- http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3469
- http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3470
- http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3471
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/01/19/10
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/01/22/1
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/81549
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298570
- https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-01/msg03454.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201604-01