CVE-2016-10164
What it is
Multiple integer overflows in libXpm before 3.5.12, when a program requests parsing XPM extensions on a 64-bit platform, allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds write) or execute arbitrary code via (1) the number of extensions or (2) their concatenated length in a crafted XPM file, which triggers a heap-based buffer overflow.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 7.6% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 7.6% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 9.8 CRITICAL (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 7.6% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- x.org Libxpm ≤ 3.5.11
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 9.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2016-10164.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2016-10164. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/22/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/25/7
- https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libXpm/commit/?id=d1167418f0fd02a27f617ec5afd6db053afbe185
- https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2016-December/058537.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/22/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/25/7
- https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libXpm/commit/?id=d1167418f0fd02a27f617ec5afd6db053afbe185
- https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2016-December/058537.html
References
- http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3772
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/22/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/25/7
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95785
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1865
- https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libXpm/commit/?id=d1167418f0fd02a27f617ec5afd6db053afbe185
- https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2016-December/058537.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-72
- http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3772
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/22/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2017/01/25/7
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95785
- https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017:1865
- https://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libXpm/commit/?id=d1167418f0fd02a27f617ec5afd6db053afbe185
- https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2016-December/058537.html
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201701-72