CVE-2016-0270
What it is
IBM Domino 9.0.1 Fix Pack 3 Interim Fix 2 through 9.0.1 Fix Pack 5 Interim Fix 1, when using TLS and AES GCM, uses random nonce generation, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain the authentication key and spoof data by leveraging the reuse of a nonce in a session and a "forbidden attack." NOTE: this CVE has been incorrectly used for GCM nonce reuse issues in other products; see CVE-2016-10213 for the A10 issue, CVE-2016-10212 for the Radware issue, and CVE-2017-5933 for the Citrix issue.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure.
- Exploit odds
- 3.1% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 3.1% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.9 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 3.1% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-200 · Information exposure
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- IBM Client Application Access 1.0.0.1
- IBM Domino 9.0.1.3
- IBM Domino 9.0.1.4
- IBM Domino 9.0.1.5
- IBM Notes 9.0.1.3
- IBM Notes 9.0.1.4
- IBM Notes 9.0.1.5
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 5.9
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2016-0270.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2016-0270. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979604
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979669
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979673
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979604
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979669
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979673
References
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979604
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979669
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979673
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96062
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037795
- https://github.com/nonce-disrespect/nonce-disrespect
- https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX220329
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979604
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979669
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21979673
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96062
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1037795
- https://github.com/nonce-disrespect/nonce-disrespect
- https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX220329