CVE-2015-8751
What it is
Integer overflow in the jas_matrix_create function in JasPer allows context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact via a crafted JPEG 2000 image, related to integer multiplication for memory allocation.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in, but needs a user to act. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 2.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 8.8 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-190 · Integer overflow
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Jasper Project Jasper < 1.900.4
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 8.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2015-8751.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2015-8751. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re28d4c3c5b77138de47bf5b2ad04886d9104eb74ae3594e5f7254318%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf15130c7b5f703664ce57a97934ffb8cc6065cbb1bf678dca8651519%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re28d4c3c5b77138de47bf5b2ad04886d9104eb74ae3594e5f7254318%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf15130c7b5f703664ce57a97934ffb8cc6065cbb1bf678dca8651519%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
References
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/01/07/10
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/01/08/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/01/11/3
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/80035
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294039
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re28d4c3c5b77138de47bf5b2ad04886d9104eb74ae3594e5f7254318%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf15130c7b5f703664ce57a97934ffb8cc6065cbb1bf678dca8651519%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/01/07/10
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/01/08/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2016/01/11/3
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/80035
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294039
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/re28d4c3c5b77138de47bf5b2ad04886d9104eb74ae3594e5f7254318%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf15130c7b5f703664ce57a97934ffb8cc6065cbb1bf678dca8651519%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E