CVE-2015-8605
What it is
ISC DHCP 4.x before 4.1-ESV-R12-P1, 4.2.x, and 4.3.x before 4.3.3-P1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via an invalid length field in a UDP IPv4 packet.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited from the same network segment without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 82.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 82.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 6.5 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 82.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-20 · Improper input validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Sophos Unified Threat Management up2date ≤ 9.318
- Sophos Unified Threat Management up2date ≤ 9.353
- Isc Dhcp 4.0.0
- Isc Dhcp 4.0.1
- Isc Dhcp 4.0.2
- Isc Dhcp 4.0.3
- Isc Dhcp 4.1-esv
- Isc Dhcp 4.1.0
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 6.5
- Attack vector
- Adjacent network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2015-8605.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2015-8605. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
References
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-January/175594.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-January/176031.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-02/msg00162.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-02/msg00168.html
- http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3442
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjan2016-2867206.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/80703
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034657
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2868-1
- https://blogs.sophos.com/2016/02/17/utm-up2date-9-354-released/
- https://blogs.sophos.com/2016/02/29/utm-up2date-9-319-released/
- https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01334
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-January/175594.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2016-January/176031.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-02/msg00162.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-02/msg00168.html
- http://www.debian.org/security/2016/dsa-3442
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjan2016-2867206.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/80703
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1034657
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-2868-1
- https://blogs.sophos.com/2016/02/17/utm-up2date-9-354-released/
- https://blogs.sophos.com/2016/02/29/utm-up2date-9-319-released/
- https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01334