CVE-2015-8080
What it is
Integer overflow in the getnum function in lua_struct.c in Redis 2.8.x before 2.8.24 and 3.0.x before 3.0.6 allows context-dependent attackers with permission to run Lua code in a Redis session to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) or possibly bypass intended sandbox restrictions via a large number, which triggers a stack-based buffer overflow.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 4.6% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 4.6% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 4.6% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-190 · Integer overflow
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Redislabs Redis < 2.8.24
- Redislabs Redis < 3.0.6
- Redislabs Redis < 5.0.8
- Debian Linux 8.0
- Debian Linux 9.0
- Opensuse Leap 42.1
- Opensuse 13.2
- Redhat Openstack 6.0
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2015-8080.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2015-8080. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
References
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-05/msg00126.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0095.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0096.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0097.html
- http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3412
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/06/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/06/4
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/77507
- https://github.com/antirez/redis/issues/2855
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/2.8/00-RELEASENOTES
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.0/00-RELEASENOTES
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-16
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2016-05/msg00126.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0095.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0096.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0097.html
- http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3412
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/06/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/11/06/4
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/77507
- https://github.com/antirez/redis/issues/2855
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/2.8/00-RELEASENOTES
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/antirez/redis/3.0/00-RELEASENOTES
- https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201702-16