CVE-2015-3195
What it is
The ASN1_TFLG_COMBINE implementation in crypto/asn1/tasn_dec.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8zh, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0t, 1.0.1 before 1.0.1q, and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2e mishandles errors caused by malformed X509_ATTRIBUTE data, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by triggering a decoding failure in a PKCS#7 or CMS application.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 38.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 38.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.3 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 38.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-200 · Information exposure
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Apple Mac Os X < 10.11.4
- Oracle Api Gateway 11.1.2.3.0
- Oracle Api Gateway 11.1.2.4.0
- Oracle Communications Webrtc Session Controller 7.0
- Oracle Communications Webrtc Session Controller 7.1
- Oracle Communications Webrtc Session Controller 7.2
- Oracle Exalogic Infrastructure 1.0
- Oracle Exalogic Infrastructure 2.0
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 5.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2015-3195.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2015-3195. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
References
- http://fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-advisory-december-2015
- http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10733
- http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10759
- http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10761
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2016/Mar/msg00004.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-December/173801.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00009.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00017.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00070.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00071.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00087.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2015-12/msg00103.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=145382583417444&w=2
- http://openssl.org/news/secadv/20151203.txt
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2616.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2617.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2056.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2957.html
- http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20151204-openssl
- http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3413
- http://www.fortiguard.com/advisory/openssl-advisory-december-2015
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuapr2016v3-2985753.html
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujan2018-3236628.html
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html