CVE-2015-1964
What it is
Stack-based buffer overflow in the server in IBM Tivoli Storage Manager FastBack 6.1 before 6.1.12 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via unspecified vectors, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-1924, CVE-2015-1925, CVE-2015-1929, CVE-2015-1930, CVE-2015-1948, CVE-2015-1953, CVE-2015-1954, CVE-2015-1962, CVE-2015-1963, and CVE-2015-1965.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 2.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.8 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Fastback 6.1.0.0
- IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Fastback 6.1.1.0
- IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Fastback 6.1.7.2
- IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Fastback 6.1.8.0
- IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Fastback 6.1.8.1
- IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Fastback 6.1.9.0
- IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Fastback 6.1.9.1
- IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Fastback 6.1.10.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2015-1964.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2015-1964. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21959398
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21959398