CVE-2014-7857
What it is
D-Link DNS-320L firmware before 1.04b12, DNS-327L before 1.03b04 Build0119, DNR-326 1.40b03, DNS-320B 1.02b01, DNS-345 1.03b06, DNS-325 1.05b03, and DNS-322L 2.00b07 allow remote attackers to bypass authentication and log in with administrator permissions by passing the cgi_set_wto command in the cmd parameter, and setting the spawned session's cookie to username=admin.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 15.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- ReservedThe CVE id was reserved by its CNA
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 15.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 9.8 CRITICAL (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 15.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-287 · Improper authentication
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- D-Link dns-322l Firmware ≤ 2.00b07
- D-Link dns-325 Firmware ≤ 1.05b03
- D-Link dns-345 Firmware ≤ 1.03b06
- D-Link dns-320b Firmware ≤ 1.02b01
- D-Link dnr-326 Firmware ≤ 1.40b03
- D-Link dns-327l Firmware ≤ 1.02
- D-Link dns-320l Firmware ≤ 1.03b04
Attack profile CVSS 3.0 · 9.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2014-7857.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2014-7857. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/132075/D-Link-Bypass-Buffer-Overflow.html
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/May/125
- http://www.search-lab.hu/media/D-Link_Security_advisory_3_0_public.pdf
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/535626/100/200/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74880
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/132075/D-Link-Bypass-Buffer-Overflow.html
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/May/125
- http://www.search-lab.hu/media/D-Link_Security_advisory_3_0_public.pdf
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/535626/100/200/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/74880