CVE-2014-0195

What it is

The dtls1_reassemble_fragment function in d1_both.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly validate fragment lengths in DTLS ClientHello messages, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (buffer overflow and application crash) via a long non-initial fragment.

At a glance

Exploitability

Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.

Exploit odds

100.0% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.

Fix

A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.

Timeline

1. 2014-06-05 21:55 UTC PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
2. 2026-06-17 00:02 UTC Last updatedMost recent change to the record

Why it ranks here

• Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
• Exploit odds: 100.0% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
• Severity: 6.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
• Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.

Details

Published

2014-06-05 21:55 UTC

Last modified

2026-06-17 00:02 UTC

Exploit probability

100.0% · EPSS, next 30 days

Weakness

CWE-120 · Classic buffer overflow

Record status

Modified

Affected

• OpenSSL < 0.9.8za
• OpenSSL < 1.0.0m
• OpenSSL < 1.0.1h
• Mariadb < 10.0.13
• Opensuse Leap 42.1
• Opensuse 13.2
• Fedoraproject Fedora 19
• Fedoraproject Fedora 20

Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 6.8

Attack vector

Network

Complexity

Medium

Authentication

None

Confidentiality

Partial

Integrity

Partial

Availability

Partial

Is it in your code?

Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.

Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2014-0195.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2014-0195. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.

Copy as ticket · More options · Status badge