CVE-2013-6629
What it is
The get_sos function in jdmarker.c in (1) libjpeg 6b and (2) libjpeg-turbo through 1.3.0, as used in Google Chrome before 31.0.1650.48, Ghostscript, and other products, does not check for certain duplications of component data during the reading of segments that follow Start Of Scan (SOS) JPEG markers, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from uninitialized memory locations via a crafted JPEG image.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 9.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 9.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.0 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 9.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-200 · Information exposure
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Google Chrome < 31.0.1650.48
- Oracle Solaris 11.3
- Artifex Gpl Ghostscript < 9.03
- libjpeg-turbo < 1.3.1
- Fedoraproject Fedora 18
- Fedoraproject Fedora 19
- Fedoraproject Fedora 20
- Opensuse 12.2
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2013-6629.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2013-6629. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=686980
- http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2013/11/stable-channel-update.html
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=891693
- https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2013-6629
- https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?revision=229729&view=revision
- http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=686980
- http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2013/11/stable-channel-update.html
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=891693
- https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2013-6629
- https://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome?revision=229729&view=revision
References
- http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2013-0333.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2013-11/0080.html
- http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=686980
- http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/2013/11/stable-channel-update.html
- http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-December/123437.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-December/124108.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-December/124257.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2014-January/125470.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-11/msg00025.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-11/msg00026.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-12/msg00002.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-12/msg00085.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-12/msg00086.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-12/msg00087.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-12/msg00119.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-12/msg00120.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-12/msg00121.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-01/msg00002.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2014-01/msg00042.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140852886808946&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=140852974709252&w=2
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1803.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1804.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/56175