CVE-2013-1960
What it is
Heap-based buffer overflow in the t2p_process_jpeg_strip function in tiff2pdf in libtiff 4.0.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted TIFF image file.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 11.8% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 11.8% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 9.3 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 11.8% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Remotesensing Libtiff ≤ 4.0.3
- Remotesensing Libtiff 3.4
- Remotesensing Libtiff 3.5.1
- Remotesensing Libtiff 3.5.2
- Remotesensing Libtiff 3.5.3
- Remotesensing Libtiff 3.5.4
- Remotesensing Libtiff 3.5.5
- Remotesensing Libtiff 3.5.6
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 9.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2013-1960.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2013-1960. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/53237
- http://secunia.com/advisories/53765
- http://secunia.com/advisories/53237
- http://secunia.com/advisories/53765
References
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-May/104916.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-May/105253.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-May/105828.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-06/msg00058.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-06/msg00080.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0223.html
- http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2013/q2/254
- http://secunia.com/advisories/53237
- http://secunia.com/advisories/53765
- http://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2698
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/59609
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952158
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-May/104916.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-May/105253.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-May/105828.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-06/msg00058.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-06/msg00080.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0223.html
- http://seclists.org/oss-sec/2013/q2/254
- http://secunia.com/advisories/53237
- http://secunia.com/advisories/53765
- http://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2698
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/59609
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952158