CVE-2013-0255
What it is
PostgreSQL 9.2.x before 9.2.3, 9.1.x before 9.1.8, 9.0.x before 9.0.12, 8.4.x before 8.4.16, and 8.3.x before 8.3.23 does not properly declare the enum_recv function in backend/utils/adt/enum.c, which causes it to be invoked with incorrect arguments and allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (server crash) or read sensitive process memory via a crafted SQL command, which triggers an array index error and an out-of-bounds read.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network with a login. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 3.6% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 3.6% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 6.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 3.6% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-20 · Improper input validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- PostgreSQL 8.3
- PostgreSQL 8.3.1
- PostgreSQL 8.3.2
- PostgreSQL 8.3.3
- PostgreSQL 8.3.4
- PostgreSQL 8.3.5
- PostgreSQL 8.3.6
- PostgreSQL 8.3.7
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 6.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2013-0255.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2013-0255. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
References
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-February/098586.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-02/msg00059.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-02/msg00060.html
- http://osvdb.org/89935
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1475.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/51923
- http://secunia.com/advisories/52819
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1028092
- http://www.debian.org/security/2013/dsa-2630
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:142
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html
- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/release-8-3-23.html
- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/static/release-8-4-16.html
- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/release-9-0-12.html
- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/release-9-1-8.html
- http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/release-9-2-3.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57844
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1717-1
- https://blogs.oracle.com/sunsecurity/entry/cve_2013_0255_array_index
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=907892
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/81917
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-February/098586.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-02/msg00059.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2013-02/msg00060.html
- http://osvdb.org/89935