CVE-2013-0169
What it is
The TLS protocol 1.1 and 1.2 and the DTLS protocol 1.0 and 1.2, as used in OpenSSL, OpenJDK, PolarSSL, and other products, do not properly consider timing side-channel attacks on a MAC check requirement during the processing of malformed CBC padding, which allows remote attackers to conduct distinguishing attacks and plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of timing data for crafted packets, aka the "Lucky Thirteen" issue.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 35.6% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 35.6% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 2.6 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 35.6% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-310
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- OpenSSL ≤ 0.9.8x
- OpenSSL ≤ 1.0.0j
- OpenSSL ≤ 1.0.1d
- Oracle Openjdk 1.6.0
- Oracle Openjdk 1.7.0
- Polarssl 0.10.0
- Polarssl 0.10.1
- Polarssl 0.11.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 2.6
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2013-0169.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2013-0169. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20130204.txt
- https://polarssl.org/tech-updates/releases/polarssl-1.2.5-released
- http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20130204.txt
- https://polarssl.org/tech-updates/releases/polarssl-1.2.5-released
References
- http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2013/02/20/security-icedtea-2-1-6-2-2-6-2-3-7-for-openjdk-7-released/
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Sep/msg00002.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2013-April/101366.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-02/msg00020.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-03/msg00000.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-03/msg00002.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2013-04/msg00020.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2014-03/msg00001.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-03/msg00027.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2016-03/msg00011.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136396549913849&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136432043316835&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136439120408139&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136733161405818&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=137545771702053&w=2
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/05/24
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0587.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0782.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0783.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0833.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1455.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-1456.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/53623
- http://secunia.com/advisories/55108
- http://secunia.com/advisories/55139