CVE-2012-6122
What it is
Buffer overflow in the thread scheduler in Chicken before 4.8.0.1 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) by opening a file descriptor with a large integer value.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 2.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-120 · Classic buffer overflow
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- call-cc Chicken < 4.8.0.1
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2012-6122.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2012-6122. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-announce/2013-10/msg00000.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/05/08/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/05/09/1
- https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2012-11/msg00075.html
- http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-announce/2013-10/msg00000.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/05/08/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/05/09/1
- https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2012-11/msg00075.html
References
- http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-announce/2013-10/msg00000.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/08/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/05/08/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/05/09/1
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2012-6122
- https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2012-11/msg00075.html
- https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2012-06/msg00031.html
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2012-6122
- http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/chicken-announce/2013-10/msg00000.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/02/08/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/05/08/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2013/05/09/1
- https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2012-6122
- https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2012-11/msg00075.html
- https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-users/2012-06/msg00031.html
- https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2012-6122