CVE-2012-5633
What it is
The URIMappingInterceptor in Apache CXF before 2.5.8, 2.6.x before 2.6.5, and 2.7.x before 2.7.2, when using the WSS4JInInterceptor, bypasses WS-Security processing, which allows remote attackers to obtain access to SOAP services via an HTTP GET request.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 8.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 8.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 8.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-287 · Improper authentication
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Apache Cxf ≤ 2.5.7
- Apache Cxf 2.5.0
- Apache Cxf 2.5.1
- Apache Cxf 2.5.2
- Apache Cxf 2.5.3
- Apache Cxf 2.5.4
- Apache Cxf 2.5.5
- Apache Cxf 2.5.6
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2012-5633.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2012-5633. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://cxf.apache.org/cve-2012-5633.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/51988
- http://secunia.com/advisories/52183
- http://cxf.apache.org/cve-2012-5633.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/51988
- http://secunia.com/advisories/52183
References
- http://cxf.apache.org/cve-2012-5633.html
- http://osvdb.org/90079
- http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/120213/Apache-CXF-WS-Security-URIMappingInterceptor-Bypass.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0256.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0257.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0258.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0259.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0726.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0743.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0749.html
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2013/Feb/39
- http://secunia.com/advisories/51988
- http://secunia.com/advisories/52183
- http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7933293/why-does-apache-cxf-ws-security-implementation-ignore-get-requests
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1409324
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1420698
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/57874
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/81980
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-4629
- https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBWS-3575
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r36e44ffc1a9b365327df62cdfaabe85b9a5637de102cea07d79b2dbf%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc774278135816e7afc943dc9fc78eb0764f2c84a2b96470a0187315c%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd49aabd984ed540c8ff7916d4d79405f3fa311d2fdbcf9ed307839a6%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rec7160382badd3ef4ad017a22f64a266c7188b9ba71394f0d321e2d4%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rfb87e0bf3995e7d560afeed750fac9329ff5f1ad49da365129b7f89e%40%3Ccommits.cxf.apache.org%3E