CVE-2012-4445
What it is
Heap-based buffer overflow in the eap_server_tls_process_fragment function in eap_server_tls_common.c in the EAP authentication server in hostapd 0.6 through 1.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash or abort) via a small "TLS Message Length" value in an EAP-TLS message with the "More Fragments" flag set.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 4.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 4.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.3 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 4.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- w1.fi Hostapd 0.6.0
- w1.fi Hostapd 0.6.1
- w1.fi Hostapd 0.6.2
- w1.fi Hostapd 0.6.3
- w1.fi Hostapd 0.6.4
- w1.fi Hostapd 0.6.5
- w1.fi Hostapd 0.6.6
- w1.fi Hostapd 0.6.7
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2012-4445.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2012-4445. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50805
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50888
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50805
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50888
References
- http://osvdb.org/86051
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50805
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50888
- http://w1.fi/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=hostap.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=586c446e0ff42ae00315b014924ec669023bd8de
- http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2557
- http://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-12:07.hostapd.asc
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:168
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/08/3
- http://www.pre-cert.de/advisories/PRE-SA-2012-07.txt
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55826
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027808
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79104
- http://osvdb.org/86051
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50805
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50888
- http://w1.fi/gitweb/gitweb.cgi?p=hostap.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=586c446e0ff42ae00315b014924ec669023bd8de
- http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2557
- http://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-12:07.hostapd.asc
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:168
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/08/3
- http://www.pre-cert.de/advisories/PRE-SA-2012-07.txt
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55826
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027808
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/79104