CVE-2012-4244
What it is
ISC BIND 9.x before 9.7.6-P3, 9.8.x before 9.8.3-P3, 9.9.x before 9.9.1-P3, and 9.4-ESV and 9.6-ESV before 9.6-ESV-R7-P3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (assertion failure and named daemon exit) via a query for a long resource record.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 35.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 35.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.8 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 35.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Isc Bind 9.0
- Isc Bind 9.0.0
- Isc Bind 9.0.1
- Isc Bind 9.1
- Isc Bind 9.1.0
- Isc Bind 9.1.1
- Isc Bind 9.1.2
- Isc Bind 9.1.3
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2012-4244.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2012-4244. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
References
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Sep/msg00002.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-September/087697.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-September/087703.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-September/088381.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00021.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00022.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-10/msg00007.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=141879471518471&w=2
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1266.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1267.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1268.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1365.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50560
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50579
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50582
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50645
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50673
- http://secunia.com/advisories/51096
- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5880
- http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2547
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:152
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55522
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1566-1
- https://h20564.www2.hpe.com/portal/site/hpsc/public/kb/docDisplay?docId=emr_na-c04952488
- https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00778