CVE-2012-3955
What it is
ISC DHCP 4.1.x before 4.1-ESV-R7 and 4.2.x before 4.2.4-P2 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) in opportunistic circumstances by establishing an IPv6 lease in an environment where the lease expiration time is later reduced.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 21.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 21.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.1 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 21.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Isc Dhcp 4.1-esv
- Isc Dhcp 4.1.0
- Isc Dhcp 4.1.1
- Isc Dhcp 4.1.2
- Debian Linux 6.0
- Debian Linux 7.0
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 10.04
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 11.04
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.1
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2012-3955.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2012-3955. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
References
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-October/088882.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-September/086992.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-September/088220.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-09/msg00088.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-09/msg00103.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-09/msg00105.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0504.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/51318
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201301-06.xml
- http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2551
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:153
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55530
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027528
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1571-1
- https://blogs.oracle.com/sunsecurity/entry/cve_2012_3955_denial_of
- https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00779
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-October/088882.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-September/086992.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-September/088220.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-09/msg00088.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-09/msg00103.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-09/msg00105.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0504.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/51318
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201301-06.xml