CVE-2012-3547
What it is
Stack-based buffer overflow in the cbtls_verify function in FreeRADIUS 2.1.10 through 2.1.12, when using TLS-based EAP methods, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (server crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a long "not after" timestamp in a client certificate.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 5.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 5.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 6.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 5.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Freeradius 2.1.10
- Freeradius 2.1.11
- Freeradius 2.1.12
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 6.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2012-3547.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2012-3547. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://freeradius.org/security.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50484
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50584
- http://freeradius.org/security.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50484
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50584
References
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-09/0043.html
- http://freeradius.org/security.html
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Oct/msg00006.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-October/090171.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00023.html
- http://osvdb.org/85325
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1326.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1327.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50484
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50584
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50637
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50770
- http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2546
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:159
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/10/2
- http://www.pre-cert.de/advisories/PRE-SA-2012-06.txt
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55483
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1027509
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1585-1
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/78408
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-09/0043.html
- http://freeradius.org/security.html
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Oct/msg00006.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-October/090171.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00023.html