CVE-2012-2110
What it is
The asn1_d2i_read_bio function in crypto/asn1/a_d2i_fp.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8v, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0i, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1a does not properly interpret integer data, which allows remote attackers to conduct buffer overflow attacks, and cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact, via crafted DER data, as demonstrated by an X.509 certificate or an RSA public key.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 47.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 47.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 47.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- OpenSSL 1.0.0
- OpenSSL 1.0.0a
- OpenSSL 1.0.0b
- OpenSSL 1.0.0c
- OpenSSL 1.0.0d
- OpenSSL 1.0.0e
- OpenSSL 1.0.0g
- OpenSSL ≤ 0.9.8u
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2012-2110.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2012-2110. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
References
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2012-04/0209.html
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=22431
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=22434
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=22439
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2013/Jun/msg00000.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-April/079149.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-April/079299.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-May/080176.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2012-November/092905.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-05/msg00014.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-05/msg00015.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-09/msg00007.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133728068926468&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133951357207000&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=134039053214295&w=2
- http://osvdb.org/81223
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0518.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0522.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1306.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1307.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1308.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48847
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48895
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48899
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48942