CVE-2012-1610
What it is
Integer overflow in the GetEXIFProperty function in magick/property.c in ImageMagick before 6.7.6-4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (out-of-bounds read) via a large component count for certain EXIF tags in a JPEG image. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-0259.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 4.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 4.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 4.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-190 · Integer overflow
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Imagemagick < 6.7.6-4
- Debian Linux 6.0
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 10.04
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 11.04
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 11.10
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 12.04
- Opensuse 11.4
- Opensuse 12.1
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2012-1610.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2012-1610. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=20629
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-0259
- http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=20629
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-0259
References
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-06/msg00001.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48974
- http://secunia.com/advisories/49043
- http://secunia.com/advisories/49317
- http://secunia.com/advisories/55035
- http://ubuntu.com/usn/usn-1435-1
- http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2462
- http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=20629
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/04/6
- http://www.osvdb.org/81024
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52898
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-0259
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/74660
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2012-06/msg00001.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48974
- http://secunia.com/advisories/49043
- http://secunia.com/advisories/49317
- http://secunia.com/advisories/55035
- http://ubuntu.com/usn/usn-1435-1
- http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2462
- http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=20629
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/04/04/6
- http://www.osvdb.org/81024
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/52898
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2012-0259