CVE-2012-0043
What it is
Buffer overflow in the reassemble_message function in epan/dissectors/packet-rlc.c in the RLC dissector in Wireshark 1.4.x before 1.4.11 and 1.6.x before 1.6.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a series of fragmented RLC packets.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited from the same network segment without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 3.1% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 3.1% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 3.1% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Wireshark 1.4.0
- Wireshark 1.4.1
- Wireshark 1.4.2
- Wireshark 1.4.3
- Wireshark 1.4.4
- Wireshark 1.4.5
- Wireshark 1.4.6
- Wireshark 1.4.7
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.8
- Attack vector
- Adjacent network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:A/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2012-0043.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2012-0043. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=40266
- http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2012-03.html
- https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6391
- http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=40266
- http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2012-03.html
- https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6391
References
- http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=40266
- http://secunia.com/advisories/47494
- http://secunia.com/advisories/54425
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-201308-05.xml
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/01/11/7
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026508
- http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2012-03.html
- https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6391
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A15324
- http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=40266
- http://secunia.com/advisories/47494
- http://secunia.com/advisories/54425
- http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-201308-05.xml
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/01/11/7
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026508
- http://www.wireshark.org/security/wnpa-sec-2012-03.html
- https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6391
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A15324